- CS M.Kurthalanathan
Useful lives to Compute Depreciation:
-–Schedule-II.{(Sec.123(2)}
Schedule
II of the Companies Act 2013 deals with Depreciation. Let us discuss some of
the important points covered in this Schedule.
Depreciation:
Depreciable amount of an asset = Cost of an asset/other amount
substituted for cost
(-)
Residual value
(Residual value should not be more
than 5 % of the original cost of the asset)
|
Useful life:
‘Useful life’ may be
considered as a period over which an asset is available for use or as the
number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by
the entity.
Applicability
The Companies Act, 2013 states that
Schedule II will be applicable as follows:
·
For
a prescribed class of companies, whose financial statements are required
to comply with AS prescribed under the 2013 Act, the useful lives should
normally be in accordance with the Schedule. However, if a prescribed company
uses a different useful life, it should disclose a justification for doing so;
·
For
Government companies,useful
life or residual value of any specified asset, as notified by the relevant Regulatory
Authority shall be applied in calculating the depreciation, irrespective of the
requirements of this Schedule.
·
For
other Companies,
the useful life of an asset shall not be longer than the useful life and the
residual value shall not be higher than that prescribed in Part C.
Other Points:
1.
The following information shall be disclosed in the accounts namely;
·
Depreciation
method used &
·
Useful
lives of the assets for computing depreciation, if they are different from the
life specified in the schedule.
2.
Factory Buildings does not include offices, godowns, staff quarters.
3. During any financial
year, if any addition has been made to any asset or where any asset has been
sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed, the depreciation on such assets shall
be calculated on a pro rata basis
from the date of such addition or, as the case may be, up to the date on which
such asset has been sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed.
4. Useful life specified
in Part C of the Schedule is for the whole of the asset. Where cost of a part
of the asset is significant to total cost of the asset and useful life of that
part is different from the useful life of the remaining asset, useful life of
that significant part shall be determined separately.
5. Transitional Provisions:
From the date this Schedule comes into effect,
the carrying amount of the asset as on that date—
(a) shall be depreciated over the
remaining useful life of the asset as per this Schedule;
(b) after retaining the residual
value, shall be recognised in the opening balance of retained earnings where
the remaining useful life of an asset is NIL.
6. ‘‘Continuous process plant’’ means a plant which is
required and designed to operate for 24 hours a day.
Schedule XIV Vs Schedule II :
Companies Act,1956 – Sch.XIV
|
Companies Act,2013- Sch.II
|
It deals with only depreciation of tangible
assets.
|
It deals
with the amortization of intangible assets also.
|
It
contained rates of depreciation of tangible assets.
|
It
contains only useful lives of tangible assets and does not prescribe
depreciation rates.
|
100%
Depreciation shall be charged on assets whose actual cost does not exceed
Rs.5,000/-
|
Omits the
provision for 100% Depreciation on immaterial items i.e, assets whose actual
cost does not exceed Rs.5,000/-
|
Extra
Shift Depreciation (ESD) not applicable to
·
Items
marked NESD in the schedule Specified
items of P&M to which general rate of Depreciation was applicable.
|
Extra
Shift Depreciation (ESD) not applicable to
·
Items
marked NESD in the schedule.
·
ESD
will apply to P&M items subject to general rate i.e., useful life of 15
years.
|
Unit of
production method of depreciation not permissible as per ‘MCA Circular’
|
Unit of
production method of depreciation permitted
|
Component
approach optional (read with AS-10)
|
Component
approach mandatory
|
ESD for
double shift and triple shift was to be made separately in proportion with
No.of days for which concern worked second shift or triple shift bears to
normal No.of working days in a year.
For Seasonal factory:
Greater
of actuals and 180 days.
Other cases:
Greater
of actual and 240 days.
|
ESD
working simplified by the 2013 act-
For Double shift:
50% more
depreciation for that period for which asset used.
For Triple shift:
100% more
depreciation for that period for which asset used.
|
Practical Issues:
The new Schedule II and its treatment of Depreciation throws some interesting questions and practical problems; some of them are discussed below:
o How the rates of depreciation will be arrived at for each class of asset
under WDV method as per Schedule II, when each asset is capitalized at
different dates in a year?
o Whether there will be any retrospective impact if company changes its
existing depreciation policy (from WDV to SLM and Vice versa) under Companies
Act, 2013 and charge depreciation as per useful life provided in Schedule II?
o What will be the treatment of the balance depreciable value of the asset
in case when useful life of such asset has already expired as per new schedule
II of 2013 Act?
For example remaining carrying value of the asset is 50% of the original
cost and the remaining useful life is zero as per Schedule II, then what will
be treatment of the 50% remaining value? Should it be charged to reserves?
o Under block of assets method when different plant and machineries under
the same block are purchased in different years then in that case there will be
different rates of depreciation for each year for each new machinery purchased.
o Transitional provision requires carrying value to be depreciated over
remaining useful life which will result in very cruel outcomes.
Mr Nathan,
ReplyDeleteAll practical issues will have pragmatic solution.
Good presentation. Keep it up.
Sir pls help me with the below mentioned doubts:
ReplyDelete1.If the asset is used in double or triple shift then whether useful life of asset is to be recalculated for next year? If yes then how?
If asset is revalued during the year then whether it is to be considered as revalued at the beginning of the year or date to date calculation is to be considered?
ReplyDeleteWhat if there is a downward revaluation? how that is to be dealt?
ReplyDelete