What is the difference between Re-opening under Sec. 130 &
Re-statement under Sec. 131?
Who can apply for Re- opening of accounts? Who is authorized to pass Orders?
Accounts can be revised for how many years of the past period?
Tax implications to be kept in mind while financials are revised....
Please read .........
**********************
REOPENING OF ACCOUNTS –
SEC 130 & 131 OF
THE COMPANIES ACT 2013
By Priya Kannan, PCS, Chennai
During
26th June 2012 SEBI had announced that it may mandate restatement of accounts,
if there is any qualification by auditors which was not properly /
satisfactorily explained by the listed companies and specified the process
relating to this.
Unfortunately,
there was no provision in the Companies Act 1956 for reopening of accounts at
that time. To curtail this problem, the new Act provided a venue through Sec
130 and 131.
RE- OPENING OF ACCOUNTS UNDER SEC. 130
Sec
130 talks about re-opening of accounts based
on a Court’s or in case of any order of
Tribunal.
The
following persons are eligible to make an application to National Company Law Tribunal :
i.
Central Government
ii.
IT Authority
iii.
SEBI
iv.
Any other statutory regulatory body
v.
Any concerned person
vi.
Order made by court
vii.
Tribunal on its own.
Reopening can be done only on the following grounds :
i) that the relevant earlier year accounts were prepared in a fraudulent manner /
ii) the affairs of the company were mismanaged during the relevant period, casting a doubt on the reliability of financial statements.
The
accounts so revised or recast under this section shall be final.
VOLUNTARY REVISION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
While Sec. 130 discussed the situation where a Government agency wants to make a re- opening of financials of the Company due to some fraud on the part of the Company, Sec 131 speaks about the
voluntary revision of financial statements or Board’s report by the concerned company itself.
The
Board can revise the report in respect of any of the three preceding
financial years after obtaining approval of the Tribunal.(There is no such
period specification in case of Sec 130)
The
required form and the manner in which the application to be made is explained
in the draft rules 9.5 to 9.8.
One
among the main points in the rule is “the Management has to necessarily revise the financial statements for
all the relevant period, subsequent to the financial year for which the
revision of financial statement is sought to be made by the Board of Directors”
In
the event of revision of previous year’s accounts, the tax implications should
also be considered carefully. In such a case, the company may be compelled to
file a revised return to tax authorities and the situation will be worse in the
case of MAT.
If
there is a change in auditors, the present auditor has to report on the
restated financial statements which is really an arduous job as he has to re-audit the entire
transactions.
Situations
will be most awful in case of any merger / joint venture or similar
transactions happened during such period that was based on the previous
financial statements which is under evaluation.
However,
if there is a change in the management, it is a trouble-free way to the new
management to correct the errors made by the previous management.
The
Board’s report consists of the Director’s responsibility statement in which
they declare that they are taking the entire responsibility for the preparation
of annual accounts in line with the act and accounting standards, etc. If it is
not in accordance with the relevant law, they are having penalty clause also.
In such a case, if they are reopening this accounts whether they will be outside
the purview of penal sections ?
Let
us see in the upcoming years whether Sec 131 will be a boon or bane for companies.
Nic one:)
ReplyDeleteThank you Priyanka
Deletegood analysis.
ReplyDelete-Regards,
M.Sundar A.C.S
Thank You Sir
DeleteGood presentation.
ReplyDeleteOn what grounds, the voluntary revision u/s 131 can be done.
Thanks for the compliment and for raising an important point which i did not mention.
DeleteIf on the opinion of the Board, the financial statement or board's report do not comply with the prov of Sec 129 and 134 they may revise it with the permission of Tribunal. (only for 3 preceding financial years)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete